The issue of the UWI’s termination of the short term contract of Professor Brendan Bain is not at all about academic freedom. Those who say that it is, are misinformed, with perhaps a few who are simply being opportunistic. It is not even about whether or not the statement in Bain’s court testimony was true or untrue. At the core, it is about a program leader publicly undermining the very program and principles he was mandated to support. By his words and action, he voluntarily aligned himself with and gave endorsement to, a diametrically opposed, unacceptable message on an issue of grave import for the UWI.
The essence of the harm, therefore, more so than the content of the words that Professor Bain spoke, is the fact that an authoritative leader of the UWI, spoke with one voice with a litigant party whose purpose and objectives are in direct conflict with the policies of CHART and the UWI. This litigant clearly advocates the retention of a discriminatory regime that excludes persons from enjoying rights of equality on the basis of their sexual orientation. Consequently, the testimony instantly became associated with the UWI in deeply negative and enduring ways, placing deep question marks on the UWI’s integrity and on its public commitment, not only to progressive notions of public health and HIV programming, but more fundamentally, to nondiscrimination, equal opportunity, justice and human rights.
It is a fact that the elimination of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is a key ingredient of the UWI’s HIV programming which Professor Bain had the honour to lead for many years and about which he testified. Anti-discrimination training is a vital part of CHART’s own program, as conceded in the expert testimony. Significantly, too, the mandate of PEPFAR and the Global Fund for Aids, which funds CHART, is “to develop programs aimed at reducing HIV related stigma.” The mission of UWI’s HIV programming, HARP, as well as CHART, from the very beginning, has co-existed with a human rights agenda, a central plank of which is the need to abolish discriminatory laws on sexual orientation. This is incontestable and no one associated with it can ever claim to have been unaware of this. I can speak authoritatively to this as one who has been intimately involved with the work of the program from its inception. Further, as an HIV & Law consultant who has been actively engaged for over 20 years in policy development across the region, for governments, international organisations and NGO’s, including on important issues of human rights and justice, I understand why this must be so.
Having participated in several seminars, workshops and sessions on HIV with Professor Bain, I have witnessed firsthand that in each and every one, an important aspect of the discussions and recommendations has been the need to eliminate discrimination and stigma as a result of sexual identity, which co-exist with HIV concerns, making treatment more difficult. This enlightened position has certainly become part of the UWI’s core values. It is demonstrable therefore, that UWI’s HIV programming itself is closely aligned to and even dependent on, an egalitarian world view which rejects discrimination on grounds of sexual difference.
Professor Bain’s longstanding and excellent work on HIV and public health, is without question. Ironically, it is precisely because of his high profile that his remarks and chosen association are so damaging to UWI’s reputation and credibility. The retention of Professor Bain in such circumstances threatened to destroy much of the hard-fought gains and trust that UWI has won in the fight against the scourge of HIV and discrimination in general and seriously undermined its own institutional interests. In this context, such testimony cannot be viewed as a mere personal viewpoint, isolated and insulated from CHART and the UWI’s policy position. Indeed, typically, the very reason authorities like Professor Bain are called upon to speak is because of their professional capacity which is inextricably linked with the institution, the UWI. Thus, Professor Bain cannot separate his personal views from these comments that have come to represent the institution that is
the UWI, which is why they are viewed as harmful and irresponsible.
There is indeed room within an academic institution for individual intellectuals to pontificate about what they view as acceptable inequalities in our societies based on sexual identity, or even race, or religion, or any such thing and supposed scientific bases that support those views. However, the academic institution must draw the line when that individual opinion, intentionally or not, becomes associated with the view of the institution itself. While intellectual freedom is to be protected and encouraged, the UWI has a duty to ensure that on issues where it holds itself up as perpetuating a particular policy for the benefit of the community, the persons who are chosen to take the lead on the matter, are demonstrably in accord with that policy. I cannot think, for example, that UWI could ever appoint an academic known to be a racist, or supporting racist ideology, to head Departments devoted to Race Studies or even History Departments, or a person demonstrating that he or she believes or asserts that women are unequal and their place is in the home, to head the Gender Department! There have been several ‘scientific’ studies that claim that blacks are lazy and intellectually inferior, or women the ‘weaker sex’. Does this mean that in the name of academic freedom, the UWI should compromise its core principles of equality and allow its very integrity to be highjacked? I think not.
Professor Bain, as Head of CHART, was in a fiduciary relationship, where one is placed in a position of great trust, which in turn, induces greater responsibility and duties of care. Professor Bain, and by extension, the UWI, with this testimony, violated these fiduciary duties owed to persons living with HIV, the LGBTI community and to the many who look to it for protection and guiding principle. The bottom line is this: Having given this testimony, it would be impossible for this community, the very constituency that he is supposed to serve, ever to trust Professor Bain again. Thus, the UWI had no choice, after careful review, but to change the leadership of CHART.
Professor
Rose-Marie Belle Antoine
Dean – Faculty of Law,
UWI, St. Augustine
Nice picture, she is pretty, I’ll try to read the post.
I may as well apologize for inadvertently misspelling Rose-Marie’s name in some earlier posts. So hold your horses, ya’ll
By the way, regarding Mrs Anthony’s fine piece. I love it where she says, “at the core, it is about a program leader publicly undermining the very program and the principles he was mandated to support.” You know, like a politician who was elected on his solemn promise to provide jobs-jobs-jobs and to not embrace laws that by his own definition are “oppressive, anti-worker and anti-poor” but who turns around and does the very opposite. Or a politician who campaigned on a “free speech” platform, then the minute he is elected sets out to gag the very people who fought to place him in office. Ring a belle? Seems to me there’s gotta be a word for such a politician. And I’ll bet the…
Hey Dan, why do you imagine the St Lucian reader incapable of understanding what Rosemary Antoine wrote? You did, so why not the rest of us? There’s a saying about the “soft bigotry of low expectations.” And yes, for whatever reason the university fired Bain he is free to take remedial steps. Let’s try to deal with the song and less the singer . . . for a change? Cheers.
This statement is an abuse of the same Human Rights the dean as a member of Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) has sworn to protect. Doesn’t the dean owe Caribbean nations a duty of care when it comes to Human rights. Will all the extra judicial killings in Trinidad and St. Lucia I have not heard anybody asking for her resignation. Holding such office sometimes calls for a radical departure from the average thinking. If life at this broken down institution was so good I wonder why she was arrested and never fired for protesting against what she perceive at the time as being wrong. This UWI is the very reason the Caribbean is in such a mess. Now it’s calling for the CCJ and…
All of that to say that you had to dismiss a guy that stepped on your dainty little corns. Another WIIFM “What’s In It For Me” ramble. Grow Up.
Pure BS…do you expect the regular st. Lucian to read through and understand this mombo jumbo? You all need to learn how to communicate – not flaunt. The guy got fired because he is against the homosexual lifestyle – period. STOP THE NOISE
Claudius Francis said on his show that the termination of professor Bain was wrong. i guess he may change his views now.